Non-Extraction Management fo a Camouflaged Class III with Mandibular Repositioning Due to Occlusal Interferences and Severe Dental Wear in an Adult Patient Using Distalization Technique with Skeletal Anchorage

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56931/jhsw.2024.e17

Keywords:

Class III, Skeletal Anchorage, Orthodontics , Mini Screws

Abstract

Class III malocclusion results from a combination of hereditary and environmental factors and affects various populations, with higher prevalence in Asians and Hispanics. Characteristics include maxillary deficiency, mandibular prognathism, or both, often leading to a pseudo-Class III if left untreated. Traditional treatments involve extractions or interproximal reductions (IPR), but these approaches can be time-consuming and less acceptable to patients, especially in aesthetic zones. Skeletal anchorage with mini-screws offers a modern solution, enabling movements such as full arch distalization, intrusion beyond 1 mm, and multi-planar adjustments without excessive root stress. This method reduces treatment time and avoids complications like bowing effects often seen in conventional techniques. The case study describes a 30-year-old patient with Class III malocclusion, lower arch crowding, and incisor wear. Treatment involved using mini-screws for asymmetrical distalization in all quadrants. Bite blocks facilitated mandibular repositioning, and space was created to align the lower incisors without compromising periodontal health. The treatment took 16 months, including temporary incisal reconstructions and final restoration with lithium disilicate veneers. The patient’s malocclusion, mandibular deviation, and tooth wear were successfully addressed. The skeletal anchorage allowed precise control over movements, maintaining facial height and achieving stable occlusion. Condylar repositioning eliminated zigzag deviation and discomfort. Compared to traditional methods, this approach was faster and tailored to the patient’s needs, avoiding extractions while improving aesthetics and function. Skeletal anchorage proves effective in addressing challenges that traditional orthodontics cannot resolve, offering faster treatment times, better control in all three spatial planes, and improved patient satisfaction. This technique represents a significant advancement in orthodontic care for complex cases.

References

Caro M, Awuapara S. Revisión de los principales manejos ortodónticos interceptivos y correctivos no quirúrgicos de la maloclusión clase III. Rev Asoc Odontológica Argent. 2021;207–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.52979/raoa.1149

Avalos-González GM, Paz-Cristóbal AN. Maloclusión Clase III. Rev Tamé. 2014;3(8):279–82.

Fawaz V, Purushothaman B, Nizaro Siyo RK, Naseem KT, Ashok A, Bavitha TK. Investigation of the change in the degree of Frankfort mandibular plane angle after levelling the curve of spee in different malocclusion groups. J Orthod Sci. 2023;12(1):65. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_41_23

Dobrzynski W, Stawinska-Dudek J, Moryto N, Lipka D, Mikulewicz M. Floating–Harbor Syndrome: A Systematic Literature Review and Case Report. J Clin Med. 2024;13(12). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123435

Han JJ, Jung S, Park HJ, Oh HK, Kook MS. Evaluation of Postoperative Mandibular Positional Changes After Mandibular Setback Surgery in a Surgery-First Approach: Isolated Mandibular Surgery Versus Bimaxillary Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77(1):181.e1-181.e12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.09.008

Teramoto A, Suzuki S, Higashihori N, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T, Moriyama K. 3D evaluation of the morphological and volumetric changes of the tongue and oral cavity before and after orthognathic surgery for mandibular prognathism: a preliminary study. Prog Orthod. 2020;21(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-020-00331-7

Kim HY, Han SB. Soft-Tissue Response following Genioplasty Combined with Anterior Segmental Osteotomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;153(1):54E-63E. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010505

Sami Q ul ain, Ali B, Farooqui WA. Effects of Alt-RAMEC protocol with facemask therapy in cleft lip palate patients in a sample of Pakistani population. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03093-w

Sun L, Yuan L, Wang B, Zhang L, Shen G, Fang B. Changes of alveolar bone dehiscence and fenestration after augmented corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment: a CBCT evaluation. Prog Orthod. 2019;20(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0259-z

Brancher JA, Silva LAM da, Reis CLB, Matsumoto MAN, de Carvalho L, Antunes LS, et al. Calcification patterns and morphology of Sella turcica are related to anteroposterior skeletal malocclusions: A cross-sectional study. Ann Anat. 2024;254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2024.152233

Čutović T, Ilić J, Adamović T, Matijević S, Radojičić J, Stošić S. Dental and skeletal changes occurring after orthodontic-surgical treatment of mandibular prognathism; [Dentalne i skeletne promene nastale posle ortodontsko-hirurškog lečenja mandibularnog prognatizma]. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2023;80(3):243–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP220202035C

Cherian D, Saeed R, Anusha K, Rag B, Peter T. Management of ankyloglossia by functional frenuloplasty using diode laser. J Orthod Sci. 2023;12(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_20_22

Elsayed HS, El-Beialy AR, Alshazly R, Almohammad A, Elazab K, El-Badawy R, et al. Implant-supported canine retraction using different reactivation intervals of elastomeric chains: A CBCT-based split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Dent Press J Orthod. 2023;28(5). doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.28.5.e2123166.oar

Habibullah MA, Parmar D. Correction of Anterior Cross Bite in Mixed Dentition period using Quadhelix and Catalans appliance - A Case Report. Bangladesh J Med Sci. 2024;23(Special issue):S43–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v23i10.71735

Guo Y, Qiao X, Yao S, Li T, Jiang N, Peng C. CBCT Analysis of Changes in Dental Occlusion and Temporomandibular Joints before and after MEAW Orthotherapy in Patients with Nonlow Angle of Skeletal Class III. BioMed Res Int. 2020;2020.

Maino GB, Maino G, Cremonini F, Lombardo L. Class III treatment with mini-implants anchorage in young adult patients: short and long-term results. Dent Press J Orthod. 2023;28(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.28.2.e23spe2

de Alba y Levy JA, Chaconas SJ, Caputo AA. Effects of orthodontic intermaxillary class III mechanics on craniofacial structures. Part II - computerized cephalometrics. Angle Orthod. 1979;49(1):29–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1979)049<0029:EOOICI>2.0.CO;2

Mattu N, Virupaksha AM, Belludi A. Comparative study of effect of different lever arm positions and lengths on transverse and vertical bowing in lingual orthodontics – An FEM study. Int Orthod. 2021;19(2):281–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2021.03.003

Matsumoto MAN, Romano FL, Ferreira JTL, Valério RA. Open bite: diagnosis, treatment and stability. Braz Dent J. 2012;23(6):768–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402012000600024

Downloads

Published

— Updated on 2024-12-29